Review ask

As a clinical trial statistician or programmer, answer two short questions in Your review: the task and the inputs. Agreeing with both approves this benchmark; disagreeing with either needs a comment. Propose a fix with the Edit button on any source file, or add it to your comments.

We suggest spending no more than 5 minutes on a review. The other tabs beside Your review are background for assessment, not under review.

Summary

Lifecycle: reviewedEditUnder review
What this benchmark means
README.md

Public entries: Python and R. Passing coverage requires an installed inventory.

Goal: build a subject listing carrying SITEID.

Input: collected subject listing stored as input/dm.txt, holding SITEID.

Variables:

  • SITEID would be the site the subject enrolled at, taken directly from the collected listing.

The file's .txt ending names neither of the two formats a listing can be read from, .csv (comma-separated text) or .parquet, so nothing says how to read it. Its bytes happen to use commas today, but a reader that decided by looking inside could read the same file differently another time or differently from the next reader. The run is rejected before any data is read, so no artifact is accepted.

How to fix

Store the listing under the name of the format it is in, so that its reader is chosen by what the study declares rather than by inspection:

input:
  DM: input/dm.csv

A listing kept in some other format is converted before the study reads it, and the converted file carries the name of what it now holds.

Expected failure

Edit
the run is rejected; no artifact is accepted
expected/error.yaml
phase
validation
condition
source_profile_unknown
rule
INPUT-1
expected/error.yaml
phase: validation
condition: source_profile_unknown
spec_paths:
  - input.DM.path
rule: INPUT-1
context:
  dataset: DM
  path: input/dm.txt

Inputs

Under review
1 source file

input/dm.txt

Edit
STUDYID,USUBJID,SITEID
CTX,CTX-01,701
CTX,CTX-02,702

Unexpected Output

Under review
No artifact is produced

No fixture files in this directory.

Shaded columns are derived— = missing value

Human review and assessment

Your review

2 questions and your comments · View benchmark discussions

Mapping spec

Generated from the benchmark YAML; do not edit by hand

Dataset NameVariable NameVariable LabelTypeCodelist/Controlled TermsCoreComputational MethodOrigin
ADSLSTUDYIDStudy IdentifiercharacterCopy value from DM.STUDYID.Predecessor
ADSLUSUBJIDUnique Subject IdentifiercharacterCopy value from DM.USUBJID.Predecessor
ADSLSITEIDStudy Site IdentifiercharacterCopy value from DM.SITEID.Predecessor
VersionDateAuthorDescriptionReviewerSign-off
1.72026-10-20yamaa docs buildRead a specification in the 1.0 surface as its 0.5 counterpart; state that missing values stay missing where a mapping declares no missing handler, and leave out a declared missing answer that restates a handler's default
1.62026-10-17yamaa docs buildDescribe collected date parts written as ISO 8601 date text and times of day counted in seconds since midnight
1.52026-10-17yamaa docs buildName collected precision in words instead of letter codes; state imputation fallbacks, minimum source precision, bounds ignored outside the collected period, and invalid text with no handler as an error; describe date and datetime shifts, imputation flag codes, and partial text giving no date part
1.42026-10-15yamaa docs buildState datetime precision codes through the hour and minute, and complete only the time parts a collected datetime lacks
1.32026-09-29yamaa docs buildShow study codelist names, external dictionaries, and ISO 8601 formats in variable rows; list the document's codelist values and metadata
1.22026-09-29yamaa docs buildClassify ADaM copies from a declared input as Predecessor and recodes as Derived, and SDTM recodes of locally derived columns as Derived
1.12026-09-29yamaa docs buildResolve lookups into the donor record they select, and give every derivation shape a plain-language rule instead of its raw YAML
1.0yamaa docs buildInitial generation from spec.yaml