Review ask

As a clinical trial statistician or programmer, answer two short questions in Your review: the task and the inputs. Agreeing with both approves this benchmark; disagreeing with either needs a comment. Propose a fix with the Edit button on any source file, or add it to your comments.

We suggest spending no more than 5 minutes on a review. The other tabs beside Your review are background for assessment, not under review.

Summary

Lifecycle: draftEditUnder review
What this benchmark means
README.md

Public entries: Python and R. Passing coverage requires an installed inventory.

Goal: carry each subject's planned treatment (TRT01P) from the demographics arm, required for every subject.

Input: collected demographics with the study and subject identifiers and the planned arm.

Variables:

  • TRT01P would be the subject's planned treatment, copied from the demographics arm.

Note: the data definition states that every subject carries a planned treatment, and that statement is checked against the data. A subject whose arm was never recorded rejects the run once the planned treatments are complete, so no artifact is accepted.

How to fix

Lead with the clinical question: a subject in the analysis population was randomized to an arm, so a missing arm is a data issue. Query the site, correct the arm at its source and rerun.

When the analysis genuinely admits subjects without a planned treatment, such as screen failures kept in the dataset, state that in the submission metadata instead:

submission:
  core: Req
  mandatory: false
  origins:
    - type: Predecessor
      description: DM.ARM

Do not add a separate not-missing check beside mandatory: true; the metadata already enforces it.

Expected failure

Edit
the run is rejected; no artifact is accepted
expected/error.yaml
phase
verification
condition
not_missing_failed
rule
SUB-11
expected/error.yaml
phase: verification
condition: not_missing_failed
spec_paths:
  - columns.TRT01P.submission.mandatory
rule: SUB-11
context:
  column: TRT01P
  failure_count: 1
  keys:
    - STUDYID: YAMAA-01
      USUBJID: YAMAA-01-102

Inputs

Under review
1 source file

input/dm.csv

Edit
3 rows
input/dm.csv
STUDYIDUSUBJIDARM
YAMAA-01Placebo
YAMAA-01—
YAMAA-01Drug A

Unexpected Output

Under review
No artifact is produced

No fixture files in this directory.

Shaded columns are derived— = missing value

Human review and assessment

Your review

2 questions and your comments · View benchmark discussions

Mapping spec

Generated from the benchmark YAML; do not edit by hand

Dataset NameVariable NameVariable LabelTypeCodelist/Controlled TermsCoreComputational MethodOrigin
ADSLSTUDYIDStudy IdentifiercharacterCopy value from DM.STUDYID.Predecessor
ADSLUSUBJIDUnique Subject IdentifiercharacterCopy value from DM.USUBJID.Predecessor
ADSLTRT01PPlanned Treatment for Period 01characterReqCopy value from DM.ARM.Predecessor
VersionDateAuthorDescriptionReviewerSign-off
1.72026-10-20yamaa docs buildRead a specification in the 1.0 surface as its 0.5 counterpart; state that missing values stay missing where a mapping declares no missing handler, and leave out a declared missing answer that restates a handler's default
1.62026-10-17yamaa docs buildDescribe collected date parts written as ISO 8601 date text and times of day counted in seconds since midnight
1.52026-10-17yamaa docs buildName collected precision in words instead of letter codes; state imputation fallbacks, minimum source precision, bounds ignored outside the collected period, and invalid text with no handler as an error; describe date and datetime shifts, imputation flag codes, and partial text giving no date part
1.42026-10-15yamaa docs buildState datetime precision codes through the hour and minute, and complete only the time parts a collected datetime lacks
1.32026-09-29yamaa docs buildShow study codelist names, external dictionaries, and ISO 8601 formats in variable rows; list the document's codelist values and metadata
1.22026-09-29yamaa docs buildClassify ADaM copies from a declared input as Predecessor and recodes as Derived, and SDTM recodes of locally derived columns as Derived
1.12026-09-29yamaa docs buildResolve lookups into the donor record they select, and give every derivation shape a plain-language rule instead of its raw YAML
1.0yamaa docs buildInitial generation from spec.yaml