As a clinical trial statistician or programmer, answer two short questions in Your review: the task and the inputs. Agreeing with both approves this benchmark; disagreeing with either needs a comment. Propose a fix with the Edit button on any source file, or add it to your comments.
We suggest spending no more than 5 minutes on a review. The other tabs beside Your review are background for assessment, not under review.
Summary
README.mdPublic entries: Python and R. Passing coverage requires an installed inventory.
Goal: carry each laboratory result in AVAL and check that every result
has a baseline value for its subject and test.
Input: laboratory results carrying the test code (LBTESTCD) and the
numeric result (LBSTRESN), demographics records, and a table of baseline
values (BASE) by subject and test code.
Variables:
AVALwould be the numeric result.
Note: the check looks up each result's baseline value. It matches the subject through the demographics records, but the results, not the demographics records, build the rows, so a result has no demographics record of its own to match. The run is rejected before any data is read and no artifact is accepted.
How to fix
Match the subject of the result itself, the row's own USUBJID:
intermediates:
- id: BASELINE
dataset: LBBASE
key: [USUBJID, LBTESTCD]
Expected failure
Editthe run is rejected; no artifact is acceptedexpected/error.yaml- phase
- validation
- condition
- unknown_field
- rule
- LOOKUP-5
expected/error.yaml
phase: validation
condition: unknown_field
spec_paths:
- intermediates.BASELINE.key
rule: LOOKUP-5
context:
identifier: DM.USUBJID
intermediate: BASELINE
Inputs
Under review3 source filesUnexpected Output
Under reviewNo artifact is producedNo fixture files in this directory.
Human review and assessment
| Dataset Name | Variable Name | Variable Label | Type | Codelist/Controlled Terms | Core | Computational Method | Origin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ADLB | USUBJID | Unique Subject Identifier | character | Copy value from LB.USUBJID. | Predecessor | ||
| ADLB | LBTESTCD | Lab Test or Examination Short Name | character | Copy value from LB.LBTESTCD. | Predecessor | ||
| ADLB | LBSEQ | Sequence Number | numeric | Copy value from LB.LBSEQ. | Predecessor | ||
| ADLB | AVAL | Analysis Value | numeric | Copy value from LB.LBSTRESN. | Predecessor |
| Version | Date | Author | Description | Reviewer | Sign-off |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.7 | 2026-10-20 | yamaa docs build | Read a specification in the 1.0 surface as its 0.5 counterpart; state that missing values stay missing where a mapping declares no missing handler, and leave out a declared missing answer that restates a handler's default | ||
| 1.6 | 2026-10-17 | yamaa docs build | Describe collected date parts written as ISO 8601 date text and times of day counted in seconds since midnight | ||
| 1.5 | 2026-10-17 | yamaa docs build | Name collected precision in words instead of letter codes; state imputation fallbacks, minimum source precision, bounds ignored outside the collected period, and invalid text with no handler as an error; describe date and datetime shifts, imputation flag codes, and partial text giving no date part | ||
| 1.4 | 2026-10-15 | yamaa docs build | State datetime precision codes through the hour and minute, and complete only the time parts a collected datetime lacks | ||
| 1.3 | 2026-09-29 | yamaa docs build | Show study codelist names, external dictionaries, and ISO 8601 formats in variable rows; list the document's codelist values and metadata | ||
| 1.2 | 2026-09-29 | yamaa docs build | Classify ADaM copies from a declared input as Predecessor and recodes as Derived, and SDTM recodes of locally derived columns as Derived | ||
| 1.1 | 2026-09-29 | yamaa docs build | Resolve lookups into the donor record they select, and give every derivation shape a plain-language rule instead of its raw YAML | ||
| 1.0 | yamaa docs build | Initial generation from spec.yaml |
yamaa