Review ask

As a clinical trial statistician or programmer, answer two short questions in Your review: the task and the inputs. Agreeing with both approves this benchmark; disagreeing with either needs a comment. Propose a fix with the Edit button on any source file, or add it to your comments.

We suggest spending no more than 5 minutes on a review. The other tabs beside Your review are background for assessment, not under review.

Summary

Lifecycle: draftEditUnder review
What this benchmark means
README.md

Public entries: Python and R. Passing coverage requires an installed inventory.

Goal: record AGE for each subject, one row per study and subject.

Input: collected demographics with the study and subject identifiers and age (AGE).

Variables:

  • AGE would be the subject's age, copied from the collected records.

Note: the row identity is stated once. The study and subject identifiers already have to be present and to appear once per row, so a second requirement that they appear once repeats the first and the run is rejected before any record is read.

How to fix

Remove the unique check. The keys already require every STUDYID and USUBJID pair to be present and unique, and a repeated or missing pair fails the run as a duplicate or missing key:

keys: [STUDYID, USUBJID]

Keep unique for a different set of columns that must not repeat, such as a second identifier the keys do not name.

Expected failure

Edit
the run is rejected; no artifact is accepted
expected/error.yaml
phase
validation
condition
redundant_declaration
rule
CHECK-10
expected/error.yaml
phase: validation
condition: redundant_declaration
spec_paths:
  - verifications[0].unique
rule: CHECK-10
context:
  columns: [STUDYID, USUBJID]
  stated_by: keys

Inputs

Under review
1 source file

input/dm.csv

Edit
2 rows
input/dm.csv
STUDYIDUSUBJIDAGE
YAMAA-0154
YAMAA-0161

Unexpected Output

Under review
No artifact is produced

No fixture files in this directory.

Shaded columns are derived— = missing value

Human review and assessment

Your review

2 questions and your comments · View benchmark discussions

Mapping spec

Generated from the benchmark YAML; do not edit by hand

Dataset NameVariable NameVariable LabelTypeCodelist/Controlled TermsCoreComputational MethodOrigin
ADSLSTUDYIDStudy IdentifiercharacterCopy value from DM.STUDYID.Predecessor
ADSLUSUBJIDUnique Subject IdentifiercharacterCopy value from DM.USUBJID.Predecessor
ADSLAGEAgenumericCopy value from DM.AGE.Predecessor
VersionDateAuthorDescriptionReviewerSign-off
1.72026-10-20yamaa docs buildRead a specification in the 1.0 surface as its 0.5 counterpart; state that missing values stay missing where a mapping declares no missing handler, and leave out a declared missing answer that restates a handler's default
1.62026-10-17yamaa docs buildDescribe collected date parts written as ISO 8601 date text and times of day counted in seconds since midnight
1.52026-10-17yamaa docs buildName collected precision in words instead of letter codes; state imputation fallbacks, minimum source precision, bounds ignored outside the collected period, and invalid text with no handler as an error; describe date and datetime shifts, imputation flag codes, and partial text giving no date part
1.42026-10-15yamaa docs buildState datetime precision codes through the hour and minute, and complete only the time parts a collected datetime lacks
1.32026-09-29yamaa docs buildShow study codelist names, external dictionaries, and ISO 8601 formats in variable rows; list the document's codelist values and metadata
1.22026-09-29yamaa docs buildClassify ADaM copies from a declared input as Predecessor and recodes as Derived, and SDTM recodes of locally derived columns as Derived
1.12026-09-29yamaa docs buildResolve lookups into the donor record they select, and give every derivation shape a plain-language rule instead of its raw YAML
1.0yamaa docs buildInitial generation from spec.yaml