Review ask

As a clinical trial statistician or programmer, challenge anything in this benchmark: describe a problem in Comments, or propose a fix with the Edit button on any source file.

  1. Task: Is this a specification error a study team could realistically make, and should the build stop on it rather than continue?
  2. Inputs: Do they trigger the failure for the reason the summary gives?
  3. Expected failure: Is this the right error, raised at the right point, and would it tell the programmer what to fix?

The other tabs beside Comments are background for assessment, not under review.

Summary

Lifecycle: reviewedEditUnder review
What this benchmark means
README.md

Goal: derive REVIEWFL to flag adverse events (AEs) for protocol review.

Input: collected adverse event records carrying the collected onset date (AESTDTC) alongside the study, subject, and event sequence identifiers.

Variables:

  • REVIEWFL would contain Y when the event onset date is on or after 2025-01-01 and N otherwise, including when no onset date was collected.

Note: the decision names UNKNOWNDT instead of the onset date, and no declared column provides it, so the run is rejected before any data is read and no artifact is accepted.

How to fix

Use the declared analysis start date in the condition:

derivation:
  flag:
    condition: "ASTDT >= DATE '2025-01-01'"
    false_value: "N"
    missing: "N"

Expected failure

Edit
the run is rejected; no artifact is accepted
expected/error.yaml
phase
validation
condition
unknown_field
requirement
REQ-0189
expected/error.yaml
phase: validation
condition: unknown_field
spec_paths:
  - columns.REVIEWFL.derivation.flag.condition
requirement: REQ-0189
context:
  identifier: UNKNOWNDT

Inputs

Under review
1 source file

input/ae.csv

Edit
1 row
input/ae.csv
STUDYIDUSUBJIDAESEQAESTDTC
PILOT712025-01-15

Unexpected Output

Under review
No artifact is produced

No fixture files in this directory.

Shaded columns are derived— = missing value

Comments and assessment materials

Comments

Signed in with GitHub; saved in repository Discussions

Mapping spec

Generated from the benchmark YAML; do not edit by hand

Dataset NameVariable NameVariable LabelTypeCodelist/Controlled TermsCoreComputational MethodOrigin
ADAESTUDYIDStudy IdentifiercharacterCopy value from AE.STUDYID.Predecessor
ADAEUSUBJIDUnique Subject IdentifiercharacterCopy value from AE.USUBJID.Predecessor
ADAEAESEQSequence NumbernumericCopy value from AE.AESEQ.Predecessor
ADAEREVIEWFLProtocol Review Flagcharacter"Y" when UNKNOWNDT >= DATE '2025-01-01'; "N" otherwise; "N" when the condition is unknown.Derived
VersionDateAuthorDescriptionReviewerSign-off
1.32026-09-29yamaa docs buildShow study codelist names, external dictionaries, and ISO 8601 formats in variable rows; list the document's codelist values and metadata
1.22026-09-29yamaa docs buildClassify ADaM copies from a declared input as Predecessor and recodes as Derived, and SDTM recodes of locally derived columns as Derived
1.12026-09-29yamaa docs buildResolve lookups into the donor record they select, and give every derivation shape a plain-language rule instead of its raw YAML
1.0yamaa docs buildInitial generation from spec.yaml