Review ask

As a clinical trial statistician or programmer, challenge anything in this benchmark: describe a problem in Comments, or propose a fix with the Edit button on any source file.

  1. Task: Is this a specification error a study team could realistically make, and should the build stop on it rather than continue?
  2. Inputs: Do they trigger the failure for the reason the summary gives?
  3. Expected failure: Is this the right error, raised at the right point, and would it tell the programmer what to fix?

The other tabs beside Comments are background for assessment, not under review.

Summary

Lifecycle: draftEditUnder review
What this benchmark means
README.md

Goal: attempt one record for every subject carrying the collected age (AGE) and sex (SEX), written to a SAS Transport file.

Input: collected demographics records, one per subject.

Variables:

  • AGE would be the collected age, carried into the result unchanged.
  • SEX would be the sex collected in the demographics records, carried into the result unchanged.

Note: the result file named here is a SAS Transport file. That container bounds names to eight uppercase characters, labels to forty, and text to two hundred bytes, and it has no whole-number type and no calendar type, so it cannot hold everything this language admits. A transport file is produced by the packaging step that assembles a submission from published results, not by this run, so the run is rejected before any data is read and no result is accepted.

How to fix

Name a file this language writes: .csv for a reviewable artifact, or .parquet for a production one that carries its own types.

output:
  path: adsl.parquet
  columns: [STUDYID, USUBJID, AGE, SEX]

Convert the published artifact to SAS Transport in the packaging step that assembles the submission. The name, label, text, number, and date limits the container imposes are decided there, against the submission being built, and a name or a value the container cannot carry is a packaging failure rather than a silent change to the dataset.

Expected failure

Edit
the run is rejected; no artifact is accepted
expected/error.yaml
phase
validation
condition
unknown_artifact_profile
requirement
REQ-0760
expected/error.yaml
phase: validation
condition: unknown_artifact_profile
spec_paths:
  - output.path
requirement: REQ-0760
context:
  path: adsl.xpt
  permitted: ['.csv', '.parquet']

Inputs

Under review
1 source file

input/dm.csv

Edit
2 rows
input/dm.csv
STUDYIDUSUBJIDAGESEX
PILOT764F
PILOT758M

Unexpected Output

Under review
No artifact is produced

No fixture files in this directory.

Shaded columns are derived— = missing value

Comments and assessment materials

Comments

Signed in with GitHub; saved in repository Discussions

Mapping spec

Generated from the benchmark YAML; do not edit by hand

Dataset NameVariable NameVariable LabelTypeCodelist/Controlled TermsCoreComputational MethodOrigin
ADSLSTUDYIDStudy IdentifiercharacterCopy value from DM.STUDYID.Predecessor
ADSLUSUBJIDUnique Subject IdentifiercharacterCopy value from DM.USUBJID.Predecessor
ADSLAGEAgenumericCopy value from DM.AGE.Predecessor
ADSLSEXSexcharacterCopy value from DM.SEX.Predecessor
VersionDateAuthorDescriptionReviewerSign-off
1.32026-09-29yamaa docs buildShow study codelist names, external dictionaries, and ISO 8601 formats in variable rows; list the document's codelist values and metadata
1.22026-09-29yamaa docs buildClassify ADaM copies from a declared input as Predecessor and recodes as Derived, and SDTM recodes of locally derived columns as Derived
1.12026-09-29yamaa docs buildResolve lookups into the donor record they select, and give every derivation shape a plain-language rule instead of its raw YAML
1.0yamaa docs buildInitial generation from spec.yaml