Review ask

As a clinical trial statistician or programmer, challenge anything in this benchmark: describe a problem in Comments, or propose a fix with the Edit button on any source file.

  1. Task: Is this a specification error a study team could realistically make, and should the build stop on it rather than continue?
  2. Inputs: Do they trigger the failure for the reason the summary gives?
  3. Expected failure: Is this the right error, raised at the right point, and would it tell the programmer what to fix?

The other tabs beside Comments are background for assessment, not under review.

Summary

Lifecycle: reviewedEditUnder review
What this benchmark means
README.md

Goal: carry age into AGE and group subjects into AGEGRP, with the older group holding elderly and the younger group holding younger.

Input: collected demographics carrying age (AGE).

Variables:

  • AGEGRP would contain elderly for subjects aged 65 or older and younger for everyone else, including a subject with no recorded age. The older group's fixed value is written as a structure instead of a single value, and no reader may guess which part names the group, so the run is rejected before any data is read and no artifact is accepted.

How to fix

Decide the exact text the group carries, then write that single value. When the older group reads as one word, state the word:

- when: "AGE >= 65"
  then: {literal: elderly}

When the value genuinely has parts, each part needs its own result column rather than sharing one.

Expected failure

Edit
the run is rejected; no artifact is accepted
expected/error.yaml
phase
validation
condition
invalid_field_type
requirement
REQ-0287
expected/error.yaml
phase: validation
condition: invalid_field_type
spec_paths:
  - columns.AGEGRP.derivation.case[0].then.literal
requirement: REQ-0287
context:
  expected: literal_value
  actual: mapping

Inputs

Under review
1 source file

input/dm.csv

Edit
4 rows
input/dm.csv
STUDYIDUSUBJIDAGE
YAMAA-0172
YAMAA-0154
YAMAA-0165
YAMAA-01—

Unexpected Output

Under review
No artifact is produced

No fixture files in this directory.

Shaded columns are derived— = missing value

Comments and assessment materials

Comments

Signed in with GitHub; saved in repository Discussions

Mapping spec

Generated from the benchmark YAML; do not edit by hand

Dataset NameVariable NameVariable LabelTypeCodelist/Controlled TermsCoreComputational MethodOrigin
ADSLSTUDYIDStudy IdentifiercharacterCopy value from DM.STUDYID.Predecessor
ADSLUSUBJIDUnique Subject IdentifiercharacterCopy value from DM.USUBJID.Predecessor
ADSLAGEAgenumericCopy value from DM.AGE.Predecessor
ADSLAGEGRPAge GroupcharacterIf AGE >= 65 then "{'group': 'elderly'}"; otherwise "younger".Derived
VersionDateAuthorDescriptionReviewerSign-off
1.32026-09-29yamaa docs buildShow study codelist names, external dictionaries, and ISO 8601 formats in variable rows; list the document's codelist values and metadata
1.22026-09-29yamaa docs buildClassify ADaM copies from a declared input as Predecessor and recodes as Derived, and SDTM recodes of locally derived columns as Derived
1.12026-09-29yamaa docs buildResolve lookups into the donor record they select, and give every derivation shape a plain-language rule instead of its raw YAML
1.0yamaa docs buildInitial generation from spec.yaml