As a clinical trial statistician or programmer, answer two short questions in Your review: the task and the inputs. Agreeing with both approves this benchmark; disagreeing with either needs a comment. Propose a fix with the Edit button on any source file, or add it to your comments.
We suggest spending no more than 5 minutes on a review. The other tabs beside Your review are background for assessment, not under review.
Summary
README.mdPublic entries: Python and R. Passing coverage requires an installed inventory.
Goal: build ELDFL, a character flag that marks each subject aged 65
or older with Y and leaves the rest missing.
Input: collected demographics carrying numeric age (AGE).
Variables:
ELDFLwould beYfor subjects aged 65 or older, missing otherwise.
Note: the flag's condition (AGE >> 65) is not a valid rule: >> is
not a comparison, so the run is rejected before any data is read and no
artifact is accepted.
How to fix
Write the condition as a valid rule:
flag: AGE >= 65
Expected failure
Editthe run is rejected; no artifact is acceptedexpected/error.yaml- phase
- validation
- condition
- invalid_expression
- rule
- FORMULA-1
expected/error.yaml
phase: validation
condition: invalid_expression
spec_paths:
- columns.ELDFL.derivation.flag.condition
rule: FORMULA-1
context:
predicate: "AGE >> 65"
position: 5
Inputs
Under review1 source fileinput/dm.csv
Edit2 rows| STUDYID | USUBJID | AGE | SEX |
|---|---|---|---|
| YAMAA-01 | 72 | M | |
| YAMAA-01 | 54 | F |
Unexpected Output
Under reviewNo artifact is producedNo fixture files in this directory.
Human review and assessment
| Dataset Name | Variable Name | Variable Label | Type | Codelist/Controlled Terms | Core | Computational Method | Origin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ADSL | STUDYID | Study Identifier | character | Copy value from DM.STUDYID. | Predecessor | ||
| ADSL | USUBJID | Unique Subject Identifier | character | Copy value from DM.USUBJID. | Predecessor | ||
| ADSL | ELDFL | Elderly Flag | character | "Y" when AGE >> 65; blank otherwise. | Derived |
| Version | Date | Author | Description | Reviewer | Sign-off |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.7 | 2026-10-20 | yamaa docs build | Read a specification in the 1.0 surface as its 0.5 counterpart; state that missing values stay missing where a mapping declares no missing handler, and leave out a declared missing answer that restates a handler's default | ||
| 1.6 | 2026-10-17 | yamaa docs build | Describe collected date parts written as ISO 8601 date text and times of day counted in seconds since midnight | ||
| 1.5 | 2026-10-17 | yamaa docs build | Name collected precision in words instead of letter codes; state imputation fallbacks, minimum source precision, bounds ignored outside the collected period, and invalid text with no handler as an error; describe date and datetime shifts, imputation flag codes, and partial text giving no date part | ||
| 1.4 | 2026-10-15 | yamaa docs build | State datetime precision codes through the hour and minute, and complete only the time parts a collected datetime lacks | ||
| 1.3 | 2026-09-29 | yamaa docs build | Show study codelist names, external dictionaries, and ISO 8601 formats in variable rows; list the document's codelist values and metadata | ||
| 1.2 | 2026-09-29 | yamaa docs build | Classify ADaM copies from a declared input as Predecessor and recodes as Derived, and SDTM recodes of locally derived columns as Derived | ||
| 1.1 | 2026-09-29 | yamaa docs build | Resolve lookups into the donor record they select, and give every derivation shape a plain-language rule instead of its raw YAML | ||
| 1.0 | yamaa docs build | Initial generation from spec.yaml |
yamaa