Review ask
As a clinical trial statistician or programmer, challenge anything in this benchmark: describe a problem in Comments, or propose a fix with the Edit button on any source file.
- Task: Is this a specification error a study team could realistically make, and should the build stop on it rather than continue?
- Inputs: Do they trigger the failure for the reason the summary gives?
- Expected failure: Is this the right error, raised at the right point, and would it tell the programmer what to fix?
The other tabs beside Comments are background for assessment, not under review.
Summary
README.mdGoal: report whether the first treatment start (TRTSTPR) included a
collected time.
Input: exposure records carrying a collected start date or date/time.
Variables:
TRTSTPR:Swhen the exposure start included a time andDwhen it was a complete date with no time. A start collected to the year and month only is neither a complete date nor a moment, so it cannot answer whether only the time is absent; the run stops rather than reporting a misleading precision.
How to fix
Recover the exposure day upstream when it was collected. If a date-imputation
policy applies, complete the date separately before asking
datetime_precision whether the resulting source carried a time.
Expected failure
Editthe run is rejected; no artifact is acceptedexpected/error.yaml- phase
- impute
- condition
- invalid_datetime_text
- requirement
- REQ-1183
expected/error.yaml
phase: impute
condition: invalid_datetime_text
spec_paths:
- columns.TRTSTPR.derivation.datetime_precision
requirement: REQ-1183
context:
source: EX.EXSTDTC
value: 2025-01
keys:
- STUDYID: YAMAA-01
USUBJID: YAMAA-01-101
EXSEQ: 1
Inputs
Under review1 source fileinput/ex.csv
Edit3 rows| STUDYID | USUBJID | EXSEQ | EXSTDTC |
|---|---|---|---|
| YAMAA-01 | 1 | 2025-01 | |
| YAMAA-01 | 2 | 2025-01-15T09:30:00 | |
| YAMAA-01 | 3 | 2025-01-15 |
Unexpected Output
Under reviewNo artifact is producedNo fixture files in this directory.
Shaded columns are derived— = missing value
Comments and assessment materials
Not under review
| Dataset Name | Variable Name | Variable Label | Type | Codelist/Controlled Terms | Core | Computational Method | Origin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ADSL | STUDYID | Study Identifier | character | Copy value from EX.STUDYID. | Predecessor | ||
| ADSL | USUBJID | Unique Subject Identifier | character | Copy value from EX.USUBJID. | Predecessor | ||
| ADSL | EXSEQ | Sequence Number | numeric | Copy value from EX.EXSEQ. | Predecessor | ||
| ADSL | TRTSTPR | First Exposure Date/Time Collected Precision | character | Collected datetime precision of EX.EXSTDTC: D for a complete date, M for year and month, Y for a year alone. | Derived |
| Version | Date | Author | Description | Reviewer | Sign-off |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.3 | 2026-09-29 | yamaa docs build | Show study codelist names, external dictionaries, and ISO 8601 formats in variable rows; list the document's codelist values and metadata | ||
| 1.2 | 2026-09-29 | yamaa docs build | Classify ADaM copies from a declared input as Predecessor and recodes as Derived, and SDTM recodes of locally derived columns as Derived | ||
| 1.1 | 2026-09-29 | yamaa docs build | Resolve lookups into the donor record they select, and give every derivation shape a plain-language rule instead of its raw YAML | ||
| 1.0 | yamaa docs build | Initial generation from spec.yaml |
yamaa
Comments
Signed in with GitHub; saved in repository Discussions