Review ask

As a clinical trial statistician or programmer, answer two short questions in Your review: the task and the inputs. Agreeing with both approves this benchmark; disagreeing with either needs a comment. Propose a fix with the Edit button on any source file, or add it to your comments.

We suggest spending no more than 5 minutes on a review. The other tabs beside Your review are background for assessment, not under review.

Summary

Lifecycle: draftEditUnder review
What this benchmark means
README.md

Public entries: Python and R. Passing coverage requires an installed inventory.

Goal: submit the demographics domain with its data definition, from the files its last build saved.

Input: collected demographics, one record per subject, and what the last build saved: the dataset under its earlier name, dm_v1.csv, and the run report beside it, dm-report.csv.

Variables:

  • DOMAIN is DM on every record.
  • STUDYID is the collected study identifier. A record without it is refused.
  • USUBJID is the collected unique subject identifier. A record without it is refused.

Note: the last build saved dm_v1.csv, but the current submission names dm.csv. The dataset has not been rebuilt since that name changed. Its run report still records the earlier filename, so the submission is refused before any document is written: its data definition would describe a dataset that no build of the current specification saved.

How to fix

Build and save the dataset again, so that dm.csv and its run report describe one build, then submit:

p = yamaa.project("project.yaml")
p.spec("DM").run().save()
p.submission("sdtm")

The rebuilt report names its saved file (ARTIFACT), item kind and location (KIND, SPEC_PATH, NAME), outcome (OUTCOME, CONDITION), counts (COUNT, TOTAL) and measurements (DETAILS). Check labels and targets (ID, TARGET), rules and severity (RULE, SEVERITY), and failing subject keys (KEYS) describe any checks that ran.

Do not edit the run report or rename the saved file to match it: the report records what a build read and wrote, and only a new build replaces it. spec_saved.yaml keeps the specification as it stood at that last build.

Expected failure

Edit
the run is rejected; no artifact is accepted
expected/error.yaml
phase
validation
condition
stale_artifact
rule
PROJECT-15
expected/error.yaml
phase: validation
condition: stale_artifact
spec_paths:
  - sdtm.specs[0].output.report
rule: PROJECT-15
context:
  dataset: DM
  report: dm-report.csv
  reason: artifact_path
  recorded: dm_v1.csv
  actual: dm.csv

Inputs

Under review
1 source file

input/dm_raw.csv

Edit
2 rows
input/dm_raw.csv
STUDYIDUSUBJID
CATH
CATH

Unexpected Output

Under review
8 rows presented to the failing check - not an accepted artifact

expected/dm-report.csv

Edit
6 rows
expected/dm-report.csv
ARTIFACTKINDSPEC_PATHNAMEIDTARGETRULESEVERITYOUTCOMECONDITIONCOUNTTOTALKEYSDETAILS
dm_v1.csvrunoutput—————succeeded—2——{}
dm_v1.csvinputinput.DM_RAWDM_RAW——————2——{"bytes":56,"path":"input/dm_raw.csv","profile":"csv"}
dm_v1.csvrowsbaseDM_RAW——————22—{}
dm_v1.csvcolumncolumns.DOMAINDOMAIN——————02—{"max_length":2}
dm_v1.csvcolumncolumns.STUDYIDSTUDYID——————02—{"max_length":4}
dm_v1.csvcolumncolumns.USUBJIDUSUBJID——————02—{"max_length":14}

expected/dm_v1.csv

Edit
2 rows
expected/dm_v1.csv
DOMAINSTUDYIDUSUBJID
DMCATH
DMCATH
Shaded columns are derived— = missing value

Human review and assessment

Your review

2 questions and your comments · View benchmark discussions

Mapping spec

Generated from the benchmark YAML; do not edit by hand

Variable NameVariable LabelTypeLengthControlled Terms or FormatOriginCoreConversion DefinitionVariable TypeVariable OrderComments for Define
DOMAINDomain AbbreviationCharAssignedSet constant value "DM".SDTM1
STUDYIDStudy IdentifierCharCollectedCopy value from DM_RAW.STUDYID.SDTM2
USUBJIDUnique Subject IdentifierCharCollectedCopy value from DM_RAW.USUBJID.SDTM3
VersionDateAuthorDescriptionReviewerSign-off
1.72026-10-20yamaa docs buildRead a specification in the 1.0 surface as its 0.5 counterpart; state that missing values stay missing where a mapping declares no missing handler, and leave out a declared missing answer that restates a handler's default
1.62026-10-17yamaa docs buildDescribe collected date parts written as ISO 8601 date text and times of day counted in seconds since midnight
1.52026-10-17yamaa docs buildName collected precision in words instead of letter codes; state imputation fallbacks, minimum source precision, bounds ignored outside the collected period, and invalid text with no handler as an error; describe date and datetime shifts, imputation flag codes, and partial text giving no date part
1.42026-10-15yamaa docs buildState datetime precision codes through the hour and minute, and complete only the time parts a collected datetime lacks
1.32026-09-29yamaa docs buildShow study codelist names, external dictionaries, and ISO 8601 formats in variable rows; list the document's codelist values and metadata
1.22026-09-29yamaa docs buildClassify ADaM copies from a declared input as Predecessor and recodes as Derived, and SDTM recodes of locally derived columns as Derived
1.12026-09-29yamaa docs buildResolve lookups into the donor record they select, and give every derivation shape a plain-language rule instead of its raw YAML
1.0yamaa docs buildInitial generation from spec.yaml