Review ask

As a clinical trial statistician or programmer, answer two short questions in Your review: the task and the inputs. Agreeing with both approves this benchmark; disagreeing with either needs a comment. Propose a fix with the Edit button on any source file, or add it to your comments.

We suggest spending no more than 5 minutes on a review. The other tabs beside Your review are background for assessment, not under review.

Summary

Lifecycle: draftEditUnder review
What this benchmark means
README.md

Public entries: Python and R. Passing coverage requires an installed inventory.

Goal: list each subject's planned visits, with the visit number in VISITNUM, the visit name in VISIT, and whether the visit took place in SVOCCUR: one record per visit that took place, and one per planned visit that has none.

Input: each subject's planned visits, and the visits that took place, each carrying the visit number (VISITNUM) and name (VISIT).

Variables:

  • SVOCCUR would be Y for a visit that took place and N for a planned visit with no visit that took place.

Note: a planned visit is listed as missed only when no record of that visit has been built before it. The missed visits are built first, before any visit that took place has a record, so every planned visit would look missed. The run is rejected before any data is read and no artifact is accepted.

How to fix

Build the records of the visits that took place first, then the missed visits, so a planned visit is compared with the visits already recorded:

rows:
  - id: attended
    dataset: VISITS
    derivations: ...
  - id: missed
    dataset: PLAN
    filter: "RECORDED.VISIT IS NULL"
    derivations: ...

Expected failure

Edit
the run is rejected; no artifact is accepted
expected/error.yaml
phase
validation
condition
phase_boundary
rule
LOOKUP-7
expected/error.yaml
phase: validation
condition: phase_boundary
spec_paths:
  - rows.missed.filter
rule: LOOKUP-7
context:
  identifier: RECORDED.VISIT
  available_phase: completed_prior_row_template
  required_phase: row_construction

Inputs

Under review
2 source files

input/plan.csv

Edit
4 rows
input/plan.csv
USUBJIDVISITNUMVISIT
1SCREENING
2WEEK 2
1SCREENING
2WEEK 2

input/visits.csv

Edit
3 rows
input/visits.csv
USUBJIDVISITNUMVISIT
1SCREENING
2WEEK 2
1SCREENING

Unexpected Output

Under review
No artifact is produced

No fixture files in this directory.

Shaded columns are derived— = missing value

Human review and assessment

Your review

2 questions and your comments · View benchmark discussions

Mapping spec

Generated from the benchmark YAML; do not edit by hand

Variable NameVariable LabelTypeLengthControlled Terms or FormatOriginCoreConversion DefinitionVariable TypeVariable OrderComments for Define
USUBJIDUnique Subject IdentifierCharDerivedSet per constructed row; see the Row construction sheet.SDTM1
VISITNUMVisit NumberNumDerivedSet per constructed row; see the Row construction sheet.SDTM2
VISITVisit NameCharDerivedSet per constructed row; see the Row construction sheet.SDTM3
SVOCCUROccurrenceCharDerivedSet per constructed row; see the Row construction sheet.SDTM4
TemplateInclude whenUSUBJIDVISITNUMVISITSVOCCUR
missedRECORDED.VISIT IS NULLCopy PLAN.USUBJIDCopy PLAN.VISITNUMCopy PLAN.VISITConstant "N"
attendedCopy VISITS.USUBJIDCopy VISITS.VISITNUMCopy VISITS.VISITConstant "Y"
VersionDateAuthorDescriptionReviewerSign-off
1.72026-10-20yamaa docs buildRead a specification in the 1.0 surface as its 0.5 counterpart; state that missing values stay missing where a mapping declares no missing handler, and leave out a declared missing answer that restates a handler's default
1.62026-10-17yamaa docs buildDescribe collected date parts written as ISO 8601 date text and times of day counted in seconds since midnight
1.52026-10-17yamaa docs buildName collected precision in words instead of letter codes; state imputation fallbacks, minimum source precision, bounds ignored outside the collected period, and invalid text with no handler as an error; describe date and datetime shifts, imputation flag codes, and partial text giving no date part
1.42026-10-15yamaa docs buildState datetime precision codes through the hour and minute, and complete only the time parts a collected datetime lacks
1.32026-09-29yamaa docs buildShow study codelist names, external dictionaries, and ISO 8601 formats in variable rows; list the document's codelist values and metadata
1.22026-09-29yamaa docs buildClassify ADaM copies from a declared input as Predecessor and recodes as Derived, and SDTM recodes of locally derived columns as Derived
1.12026-09-29yamaa docs buildResolve lookups into the donor record they select, and give every derivation shape a plain-language rule instead of its raw YAML
1.0yamaa docs buildInitial generation from spec.yaml