Review ask

As a clinical trial statistician or programmer, answer two short questions in Your review: the task and the inputs. Agreeing with both approves this benchmark; disagreeing with either needs a comment. Propose a fix with the Edit button on any source file, or add it to your comments.

We suggest spending no more than 5 minutes on a review. The other tabs beside Your review are background for assessment, not under review.

Summary

Lifecycle: draftEditUnder review
What this benchmark means
README.md

Public entries: Python and R. Passing coverage requires an installed inventory.

Goal: build one Demographics (DM) record per subject with the sex (SEX) collected on the demographics form.

Input: the electronic data capture (EDC) system's export as an Operational Data Model (ODM) 1.3 XML file, saved as a transactional file: a log of every entry, change and removal in the order they were made, instead of the current answers.

Variables:

  • SEX would be the subject's collected sex code, as the form holds it now.

A transactional file lists an answer once for each time it was entered or changed, and lists a removed answer as well as its removal, so its records are not the subjects' current answers. Read as if they were, a corrected answer would count twice and a removed form would still give an answer. The input is rejected while it is read, and no artifact is accepted.

How to fix

Export a snapshot from the EDC system instead: the current value of every collected item, which the export marks with FileType="Snapshot" on its root ODM element, or with no FileType at all. Applying the transactions in order is the EDC system's job, so do not edit the transactional file by hand to make it look like a snapshot:

input:
  ODM: input/odm.xml

The specification itself does not change; only the export does.

Expected failure

Edit
the run is rejected; no artifact is accepted
expected/error.yaml
phase
ingest
condition
source_odm_transactional
rule
ODM-1
expected/error.yaml
phase: ingest
condition: source_odm_transactional
spec_paths:
  - input.ODM.path
rule: ODM-1
context:
  dataset: ODM
  path: input/odm.xml
  element: ODM
  attribute: FileType
  value: Transactional

Inputs

Under review
1 source file

input/odm.xml

Edit
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<ODM xmlns="http://www.cdisc.org/ns/odm/v1.3"
     ODMVersion="1.3.2"
     FileType="Transactional"
     FileOID="STUDY01.TRANSACTIONS.20260302"
     CreationDateTime="2026-03-02T09:15:00+00:00">
  <ClinicalData StudyOID="STUDY01" MetaDataVersionOID="MDV.1">
    <SubjectData SubjectKey="101">
      <StudyEventData StudyEventOID="SE.SCREENING">
        <FormData FormOID="F.DM">
          <ItemGroupData ItemGroupOID="IG.DM" TransactionType="Insert">
            <ItemData ItemOID="IT.DM.SEX" Value="M">
              <AuditRecord>
                <UserRef UserOID="USR.CRC"/>
                <LocationRef LocationOID="LOC.01"/>
                <DateTimeStamp>2026-02-18T09:30:00+00:00</DateTimeStamp>
              </AuditRecord>
            </ItemData>
          </ItemGroupData>
        </FormData>
      </StudyEventData>
    </SubjectData>
    <SubjectData SubjectKey="101">
      <StudyEventData StudyEventOID="SE.SCREENING">
        <FormData FormOID="F.DM">
          <ItemGroupData ItemGroupOID="IG.DM" TransactionType="Update">
            <ItemData ItemOID="IT.DM.SEX" Value="F">
              <AuditRecord>
                <UserRef UserOID="USR.CRC"/>
                <LocationRef LocationOID="LOC.01"/>
                <DateTimeStamp>2026-02-24T11:05:00+00:00</DateTimeStamp>
                <ReasonForChange>Entered in error; corrected from the source document</ReasonForChange>
              </AuditRecord>
            </ItemData>
          </ItemGroupData>
        </FormData>
      </StudyEventData>
    </SubjectData>
    <SubjectData SubjectKey="102">
      <StudyEventData StudyEventOID="SE.SCREENING">
        <FormData FormOID="F.DM">
          <ItemGroupData ItemGroupOID="IG.DM" TransactionType="Insert">
            <ItemData ItemOID="IT.DM.SEX" Value="F">
              <AuditRecord>
                <UserRef UserOID="USR.CRC"/>
                <LocationRef LocationOID="LOC.01"/>
                <DateTimeStamp>2026-02-19T14:10:00+00:00</DateTimeStamp>
              </AuditRecord>
            </ItemData>
          </ItemGroupData>
        </FormData>
      </StudyEventData>
    </SubjectData>
    <SubjectData SubjectKey="102">
      <StudyEventData StudyEventOID="SE.SCREENING">
        <FormData FormOID="F.DM">
          <ItemGroupData ItemGroupOID="IG.DM" TransactionType="Remove">
            <ItemData ItemOID="IT.DM.SEX">
              <AuditRecord>
                <UserRef UserOID="USR.CRC"/>
                <LocationRef LocationOID="LOC.01"/>
                <DateTimeStamp>2026-02-26T08:45:00+00:00</DateTimeStamp>
                <ReasonForChange>Form entered for the wrong subject</ReasonForChange>
              </AuditRecord>
            </ItemData>
          </ItemGroupData>
        </FormData>
      </StudyEventData>
    </SubjectData>
  </ClinicalData>
</ODM>

Unexpected Output

Under review
No artifact is produced

No fixture files in this directory.

Shaded columns are derived— = missing value

Human review and assessment

Your review

2 questions and your comments · View benchmark discussions

Mapping spec

Generated from the benchmark YAML; do not edit by hand

Variable NameVariable LabelTypeLengthControlled Terms or FormatOriginCoreConversion DefinitionVariable TypeVariable OrderComments for Define
DOMAINDomain AbbreviationCharAssignedSet constant value "DM".SDTM1
STUDYIDStudy IdentifierCharCollectedCopy value from ODM.StudyOID.SDTM2
USUBJIDUnique Subject IdentifierCharDerivedFill the template "{ODM.StudyOID}-{ODM.SubjectKey}".SDTM3
SEXSexCharCollectedRead collected ODM item IT.DM.SEX; no identified record yields blank.SDTM4
VersionDateAuthorDescriptionReviewerSign-off
1.72026-10-20yamaa docs buildRead a specification in the 1.0 surface as its 0.5 counterpart; state that missing values stay missing where a mapping declares no missing handler, and leave out a declared missing answer that restates a handler's default
1.62026-10-17yamaa docs buildDescribe collected date parts written as ISO 8601 date text and times of day counted in seconds since midnight
1.52026-10-17yamaa docs buildName collected precision in words instead of letter codes; state imputation fallbacks, minimum source precision, bounds ignored outside the collected period, and invalid text with no handler as an error; describe date and datetime shifts, imputation flag codes, and partial text giving no date part
1.42026-10-15yamaa docs buildState datetime precision codes through the hour and minute, and complete only the time parts a collected datetime lacks
1.32026-09-29yamaa docs buildShow study codelist names, external dictionaries, and ISO 8601 formats in variable rows; list the document's codelist values and metadata
1.22026-09-29yamaa docs buildClassify ADaM copies from a declared input as Predecessor and recodes as Derived, and SDTM recodes of locally derived columns as Derived
1.12026-09-29yamaa docs buildResolve lookups into the donor record they select, and give every derivation shape a plain-language rule instead of its raw YAML
1.0yamaa docs buildInitial generation from spec.yaml