Review ask

As a clinical trial statistician or programmer, answer two short questions in Your review: the task and the inputs. Agreeing with both approves this benchmark; disagreeing with either needs a comment. Propose a fix with the Edit button on any source file, or add it to your comments.

We suggest spending no more than 5 minutes on a review. The other tabs beside Your review are background for assessment, not under review.

Summary

Lifecycle: reviewedEditUnder review
What this benchmark means
README.md

Public entries: Python and R. Passing coverage requires an installed inventory.

Goal: carry the investigator (INVID) responsible for each subject's site.

Input: collected demographics carrying the study site (SITEID) and its investigator (INVID).

Variables:

  • INVID would be the investigator of the subject's site, read from INVID.

Note: the record identity includes the site (SITEID), but the result does not carry it, so a reader of the result could not check which site a row answers for. The run is rejected before any data is read and no artifact is accepted.

How to fix

Every column that forms the record identity must appear in the output. If the site is part of the identity, carry it:

output:
  columns: [STUDYID, USUBJID, SITEID, INVID]

If study and subject already form the intended identity, drop the site from the identity instead:

keys: [STUDYID, USUBJID]

Choose the option that matches the output's actual row identity.

Expected failure

Edit
the run is rejected; no artifact is accepted
expected/error.yaml
phase
validation
condition
internal_column_in_keys
rule
OUTPUT-2
expected/error.yaml
phase: validation
condition: internal_column_in_keys
spec_paths:
  - keys[2]
rule: OUTPUT-2
context:
  column: SITEID

Inputs

Under review
1 source file

input/dm.csv

Edit
2 rows
input/dm.csv
STUDYIDUSUBJIDSITEIDINVID
YAMAA-01701INV-701
YAMAA-01702INV-702

Unexpected Output

Under review
No artifact is produced

No fixture files in this directory.

Shaded columns are derived— = missing value

Human review and assessment

Your review

2 questions and your comments · View benchmark discussions

Mapping spec

Generated from the benchmark YAML; do not edit by hand

Dataset NameVariable NameVariable LabelTypeCodelist/Controlled TermsCoreComputational MethodOrigin
ADSLSTUDYIDStudy IdentifiercharacterCopy value from DM.STUDYID.Predecessor
ADSLUSUBJIDUnique Subject IdentifiercharacterCopy value from DM.USUBJID.Predecessor
ADSLINVIDInvestigator IdentifiercharacterCopy value from DM.INVID.Predecessor
VersionDateAuthorDescriptionReviewerSign-off
1.72026-10-20yamaa docs buildRead a specification in the 1.0 surface as its 0.5 counterpart; state that missing values stay missing where a mapping declares no missing handler, and leave out a declared missing answer that restates a handler's default
1.62026-10-17yamaa docs buildDescribe collected date parts written as ISO 8601 date text and times of day counted in seconds since midnight
1.52026-10-17yamaa docs buildName collected precision in words instead of letter codes; state imputation fallbacks, minimum source precision, bounds ignored outside the collected period, and invalid text with no handler as an error; describe date and datetime shifts, imputation flag codes, and partial text giving no date part
1.42026-10-15yamaa docs buildState datetime precision codes through the hour and minute, and complete only the time parts a collected datetime lacks
1.32026-09-29yamaa docs buildShow study codelist names, external dictionaries, and ISO 8601 formats in variable rows; list the document's codelist values and metadata
1.22026-09-29yamaa docs buildClassify ADaM copies from a declared input as Predecessor and recodes as Derived, and SDTM recodes of locally derived columns as Derived
1.12026-09-29yamaa docs buildResolve lookups into the donor record they select, and give every derivation shape a plain-language rule instead of its raw YAML
1.0yamaa docs buildInitial generation from spec.yaml