As a clinical trial statistician or programmer, answer two short questions in Your review: the task and the inputs. Agreeing with both approves this benchmark; disagreeing with either needs a comment. Propose a fix with the Edit button on any source file, or add it to your comments.
We suggest spending no more than 5 minutes on a review. The other tabs beside Your review are background for assessment, not under review.
Summary
README.mdPublic entries: Python and R. Passing coverage requires an installed inventory.
Goal: carry the investigator (INVID) responsible for each
subject's site.
Input: collected demographics carrying the study site (SITEID)
and its investigator (INVID).
Variables:
INVIDwould be the investigator of the subject's site, read fromINVID.
Note: the record identity includes the site (SITEID), but the
result does not carry it, so a reader of the result could not check
which site a row answers for. The run is rejected before any data is
read and no artifact is accepted.
How to fix
Every column that forms the record identity must appear in the output. If the site is part of the identity, carry it:
output:
columns: [STUDYID, USUBJID, SITEID, INVID]
If study and subject already form the intended identity, drop the site from the identity instead:
keys: [STUDYID, USUBJID]
Choose the option that matches the output's actual row identity.
Expected failure
Editthe run is rejected; no artifact is acceptedexpected/error.yaml- phase
- validation
- condition
- internal_column_in_keys
- rule
- OUTPUT-2
expected/error.yaml
phase: validation
condition: internal_column_in_keys
spec_paths:
- keys[2]
rule: OUTPUT-2
context:
column: SITEID
Inputs
Under review1 source fileinput/dm.csv
Edit2 rows| STUDYID | USUBJID | SITEID | INVID |
|---|---|---|---|
| YAMAA-01 | 701 | INV-701 | |
| YAMAA-01 | 702 | INV-702 |
Unexpected Output
Under reviewNo artifact is producedNo fixture files in this directory.
Human review and assessment
| Dataset Name | Variable Name | Variable Label | Type | Codelist/Controlled Terms | Core | Computational Method | Origin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ADSL | STUDYID | Study Identifier | character | Copy value from DM.STUDYID. | Predecessor | ||
| ADSL | USUBJID | Unique Subject Identifier | character | Copy value from DM.USUBJID. | Predecessor | ||
| ADSL | INVID | Investigator Identifier | character | Copy value from DM.INVID. | Predecessor |
| Version | Date | Author | Description | Reviewer | Sign-off |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.7 | 2026-10-20 | yamaa docs build | Read a specification in the 1.0 surface as its 0.5 counterpart; state that missing values stay missing where a mapping declares no missing handler, and leave out a declared missing answer that restates a handler's default | ||
| 1.6 | 2026-10-17 | yamaa docs build | Describe collected date parts written as ISO 8601 date text and times of day counted in seconds since midnight | ||
| 1.5 | 2026-10-17 | yamaa docs build | Name collected precision in words instead of letter codes; state imputation fallbacks, minimum source precision, bounds ignored outside the collected period, and invalid text with no handler as an error; describe date and datetime shifts, imputation flag codes, and partial text giving no date part | ||
| 1.4 | 2026-10-15 | yamaa docs build | State datetime precision codes through the hour and minute, and complete only the time parts a collected datetime lacks | ||
| 1.3 | 2026-09-29 | yamaa docs build | Show study codelist names, external dictionaries, and ISO 8601 formats in variable rows; list the document's codelist values and metadata | ||
| 1.2 | 2026-09-29 | yamaa docs build | Classify ADaM copies from a declared input as Predecessor and recodes as Derived, and SDTM recodes of locally derived columns as Derived | ||
| 1.1 | 2026-09-29 | yamaa docs build | Resolve lookups into the donor record they select, and give every derivation shape a plain-language rule instead of its raw YAML | ||
| 1.0 | yamaa docs build | Initial generation from spec.yaml |
yamaa