Review ask

As a clinical trial statistician or programmer, answer two short questions in Your review: the task and the inputs. Agreeing with both approves this benchmark; disagreeing with either needs a comment. Propose a fix with the Edit button on any source file, or add it to your comments.

We suggest spending no more than 5 minutes on a review. The other tabs beside Your review are background for assessment, not under review.

Summary

Lifecycle: reviewedEditUnder review
What this benchmark means
README.md

Public entries: Python and R. Passing coverage requires an installed inventory.

Goal: derive cumulative dose (DOSECUM) and relative dose intensity (RDI) by subject and treatment.

Input: a subject-treatment inventory carrying the dose unit (EXDOSU), with component exposure records carrying the treatment (EXTRT), the administered dose (EXDOSE), and the planned dose (EXPLDOS) on each administration record.

Variables:

  • EXTRT names the treatment component, and EXDOSU is the unit that component is measured in.
  • DOSECUM is the total administered dose across the component's exposure records.
  • RDI is meant to be that total as a percentage of the planned dose. The planned dose is recorded on each administration record rather than once for the treatment, so dividing the total by it leaves open which record supplies the denominator, and that choice would decide the answer. The run is rejected before any data is read, and no artifact is accepted.

How to fix

First decide what the denominator means. If each exposure row carries its own planned administration, total both actual and planned dose:

derivation:
  aggregate: >-
    100 * SUM(EX.EXDOSE) / NULLIF(SUM(EX.EXPLDOS), 0)

If the denominator is one treatment-level plan, store it once in the subject treatment source, bind it to a numeric column, and compute RDI from that column and DOSECUM. Do not select one exposure row arbitrarily.

Expected failure

Edit
the run is rejected; no artifact is accepted
expected/error.yaml
phase
validation
condition
aggregate_identifier_not_grouped
rule
FORMULA-22
expected/error.yaml
phase: validation
condition: aggregate_identifier_not_grouped
spec_paths:
  - columns.RDI.derivation.aggregate.expr
rule: FORMULA-22
context:
  dataset: EX
  identifier: EX.EXPLDOS

Inputs

Under review
2 source files

input/ex.csv

Edit
5 rows
input/ex.csv
STUDYIDUSUBJIDEXTRTEXSEQEXDOSEEXPLDOS
YAMAA-01Pembrolizumab1200200
YAMAA-01Pembrolizumab2150200
YAMAA-01Pembrolizumab3150150
YAMAA-01Pemetrexed4500500
YAMAA-01Pembrolizumab1200200

input/subject_treatment.csv

Edit
3 rows
input/subject_treatment.csv
STUDYIDUSUBJIDEXTRTEXDOSU
YAMAA-01Pembrolizumabmg
YAMAA-01Pemetrexedmg/m2
YAMAA-01Pembrolizumabmg

Unexpected Output

Under review
No artifact is produced

No fixture files in this directory.

Shaded columns are derived— = missing value

Human review and assessment

Your review

2 questions and your comments · View benchmark discussions

Mapping spec

Generated from the benchmark YAML; do not edit by hand

Dataset NameVariable NameVariable LabelTypeCodelist/Controlled TermsCoreComputational MethodOrigin
ADEXSTUDYIDStudy IdentifiercharacterCopy value from TRT.STUDYID.Predecessor
ADEXUSUBJIDUnique Subject IdentifiercharacterCopy value from TRT.USUBJID.Predecessor
ADEXEXTRTName of TreatmentcharacterCopy value from TRT.EXTRT.Predecessor
ADEXEXDOSUDose UnitscharacterCopy value from TRT.EXDOSU.Predecessor
ADEXDOSECUMCumulative DosenumericAggregate SUM(EX.EXDOSE) over records matching on the shared output keys.Derived
ADEXRDIRelative Dose IntensitynumericAggregate 100 * SUM(EX.EXDOSE) / EX.EXPLDOS over records matching on STUDYID, USUBJID and EXTRT.Derived
VersionDateAuthorDescriptionReviewerSign-off
1.72026-10-20yamaa docs buildRead a specification in the 1.0 surface as its 0.5 counterpart; state that missing values stay missing where a mapping declares no missing handler, and leave out a declared missing answer that restates a handler's default
1.62026-10-17yamaa docs buildDescribe collected date parts written as ISO 8601 date text and times of day counted in seconds since midnight
1.52026-10-17yamaa docs buildName collected precision in words instead of letter codes; state imputation fallbacks, minimum source precision, bounds ignored outside the collected period, and invalid text with no handler as an error; describe date and datetime shifts, imputation flag codes, and partial text giving no date part
1.42026-10-15yamaa docs buildState datetime precision codes through the hour and minute, and complete only the time parts a collected datetime lacks
1.32026-09-29yamaa docs buildShow study codelist names, external dictionaries, and ISO 8601 formats in variable rows; list the document's codelist values and metadata
1.22026-09-29yamaa docs buildClassify ADaM copies from a declared input as Predecessor and recodes as Derived, and SDTM recodes of locally derived columns as Derived
1.12026-09-29yamaa docs buildResolve lookups into the donor record they select, and give every derivation shape a plain-language rule instead of its raw YAML
1.0yamaa docs buildInitial generation from spec.yaml