Review ask

As a clinical trial statistician or programmer, answer two short questions in Your review: the task and the inputs. Agreeing with both approves this benchmark; disagreeing with either needs a comment. Propose a fix with the Edit button on any source file, or add it to your comments.

We suggest spending no more than 5 minutes on a review. The other tabs beside Your review are background for assessment, not under review.

Summary

Lifecycle: draftEditUnder review
What this benchmark means
README.md

Public entries: Python and R. Passing coverage requires an installed inventory.

Goal: submit the subject-level analysis dataset with its data definition, written into a package folder.

Input: the demographics domain with the age (AGE), one record per subject.

Variables:

  • AGE is the age in years, copied from the demographics domain.

Note: the data definition is written into the folder package, while the dataset it describes stays beside the project, one folder up. A data definition points only at files inside its own folder, the package a reviewer receives, so the submission is refused before any document is written; the dataset itself still builds.

How to fix

Keep the data definition beside the datasets it describes:

adam:
  define: define.xml

or save the dataset into the package folder, with output.path set to package/adsl.csv.

Expected failure

Edit
the run is rejected; no artifact is accepted
expected/error.yaml
phase
validation
condition
artifact_outside_document
rule
DEFINE-16
expected/error.yaml
phase: validation
condition: artifact_outside_document
spec_paths:
  - adam.specs[0]
rule: DEFINE-16

Inputs

Under review
1 source file

input/dm.csv

Edit
2 rows
input/dm.csv
STUDYIDUSUBJIDAGE
PAR0141
PAR0173

Unexpected Output

Under review
2 rows presented to the failing check - not an accepted artifact

expected/adsl.csv

Edit
2 rows
expected/adsl.csv
STUDYIDUSUBJIDAGE
PAR0141
PAR0173
Shaded columns are derived— = missing value

Human review and assessment

Your review

2 questions and your comments · View benchmark discussions

Mapping spec

Generated from the benchmark YAML; do not edit by hand

Dataset NameVariable NameVariable LabelTypeCodelist/Controlled TermsCoreComputational MethodOrigin
ADSLSTUDYIDStudy IdentifiercharacterReqCopy value from DM.STUDYID.Predecessor
ADSLUSUBJIDUnique Subject IdentifiercharacterReqCopy value from DM.USUBJID.Predecessor
ADSLAGEAgenumericReqCopy value from DM.AGE.Predecessor
VersionDateAuthorDescriptionReviewerSign-off
1.72026-10-20yamaa docs buildRead a specification in the 1.0 surface as its 0.5 counterpart; state that missing values stay missing where a mapping declares no missing handler, and leave out a declared missing answer that restates a handler's default
1.62026-10-17yamaa docs buildDescribe collected date parts written as ISO 8601 date text and times of day counted in seconds since midnight
1.52026-10-17yamaa docs buildName collected precision in words instead of letter codes; state imputation fallbacks, minimum source precision, bounds ignored outside the collected period, and invalid text with no handler as an error; describe date and datetime shifts, imputation flag codes, and partial text giving no date part
1.42026-10-15yamaa docs buildState datetime precision codes through the hour and minute, and complete only the time parts a collected datetime lacks
1.32026-09-29yamaa docs buildShow study codelist names, external dictionaries, and ISO 8601 formats in variable rows; list the document's codelist values and metadata
1.22026-09-29yamaa docs buildClassify ADaM copies from a declared input as Predecessor and recodes as Derived, and SDTM recodes of locally derived columns as Derived
1.12026-09-29yamaa docs buildResolve lookups into the donor record they select, and give every derivation shape a plain-language rule instead of its raw YAML
1.0yamaa docs buildInitial generation from spec.yaml