Review ask

As a clinical trial statistician or programmer, answer two short questions in Your review: the task and the inputs. Agreeing with both approves this benchmark; disagreeing with either needs a comment. Propose a fix with the Edit button on any source file, or add it to your comments.

We suggest spending no more than 5 minutes on a review. The other tabs beside Your review are background for assessment, not under review.

Summary

Lifecycle: draftEditUnder review
What this benchmark means
README.md

Public entries: Python and R. Passing coverage requires an installed inventory.

Goal: flag each subject's baseline result (ABLFL) as the result collected last on or before treatment start.

Input: laboratory results carrying subject, sequence number (LBSEQ), collection date (ADT) and time (ATM), result (AVAL), and the subject's treatment start date (TRTSDT).

Variables:

  • ADT, ATM, AVAL and TRTSDT would be carried through unchanged.
  • ABLFL would be Y on the result with the latest date on or before treatment start, the latest collection time breaking a same-day tie, and blank on every other result.

Note: two results can share both the latest date and its collection time, and either one gives the subject a different baseline. The run fails and no dataset is accepted.

How to fix

Decide which of the two results is the baseline before choosing how to state it. Two results drawn at the same date and time are usually a sample and its repeat, or one result recorded twice; the source data system should carry the result the study reports, and correcting it there leaves the rule saying what it means.

When both results are reportable and the study names a further tie-break, add it after the collection time:

baseline_flag:
  date: ADT
  reference: TRTSDT
  source: AVAL
  window:
    group_by: [USUBJID]
    order_by: [ADT, ATM, LBSEQ]

Order by the term the study names; the sequence number above stands in for it and is not itself a clinical rule. Do not average the two results into one baseline value, which reports a measurement nobody took.

Expected failure

Edit
the run is rejected; no artifact is accepted
expected/error.yaml
phase
derivation
condition
ambiguous_baseline
rule
WINDOW-9
expected/error.yaml
phase: derivation
condition: ambiguous_baseline
spec_paths:
  - columns.ABLFL.derivation.baseline_flag
rule: WINDOW-9
context:
  date: "2025-03-04"
  match_count: 2
  keys:
    - USUBJID: "02"

Inputs

Under review
1 source file

input/lb.csv

Edit
4 rows
input/lb.csv
USUBJIDLBSEQADTATMAVALTRTSDT
12025-03-0208:00302025-03-03
22025-03-0214:30342025-03-03
12025-03-0409:00222025-03-05
22025-03-0409:00252025-03-05

Unexpected Output

Under review
No artifact is produced

No fixture files in this directory.

Shaded columns are derived— = missing value

Human review and assessment

Your review

2 questions and your comments · View benchmark discussions

Mapping spec

Generated from the benchmark YAML; do not edit by hand

Dataset NameVariable NameVariable LabelTypeCodelist/Controlled TermsCoreComputational MethodOrigin
ADLBUSUBJIDUnique Subject IdentifiercharacterCopy value from LB.USUBJID.Predecessor
ADLBLBSEQSequence NumbernumericCopy value from LB.LBSEQ.Predecessor
ADLBADTAnalysis DatenumericISO 8601Copy value from LB.ADT.Predecessor
ADLBATMAnalysis TimecharacterCopy value from LB.ATM.Predecessor
ADLBAVALAnalysis ValuenumericCopy value from LB.AVAL.Predecessor
ADLBTRTSDTDate of First Exposure to TreatmentnumericISO 8601Copy value from LB.TRTSDT.Predecessor
ADLBABLFLBaseline Record Flagcharacter"Y" for the last record with ADT on or before TRTSDT and a non-missing AVAL within each group of USUBJID, ordered by ADT then ATM; blank otherwise.Derived
VersionDateAuthorDescriptionReviewerSign-off
1.72026-10-20yamaa docs buildRead a specification in the 1.0 surface as its 0.5 counterpart; state that missing values stay missing where a mapping declares no missing handler, and leave out a declared missing answer that restates a handler's default
1.62026-10-17yamaa docs buildDescribe collected date parts written as ISO 8601 date text and times of day counted in seconds since midnight
1.52026-10-17yamaa docs buildName collected precision in words instead of letter codes; state imputation fallbacks, minimum source precision, bounds ignored outside the collected period, and invalid text with no handler as an error; describe date and datetime shifts, imputation flag codes, and partial text giving no date part
1.42026-10-15yamaa docs buildState datetime precision codes through the hour and minute, and complete only the time parts a collected datetime lacks
1.32026-09-29yamaa docs buildShow study codelist names, external dictionaries, and ISO 8601 formats in variable rows; list the document's codelist values and metadata
1.22026-09-29yamaa docs buildClassify ADaM copies from a declared input as Predecessor and recodes as Derived, and SDTM recodes of locally derived columns as Derived
1.12026-09-29yamaa docs buildResolve lookups into the donor record they select, and give every derivation shape a plain-language rule instead of its raw YAML
1.0yamaa docs buildInitial generation from spec.yaml