As a clinical trial statistician or programmer, answer two short questions in Your review: the task and the inputs. Agreeing with both approves this benchmark; disagreeing with either needs a comment. Propose a fix with the Edit button on any source file, or add it to your comments.
We suggest spending no more than 5 minutes on a review. The other tabs beside Your review are background for assessment, not under review.
Summary
README.mdPublic entries: Python and R. Passing coverage requires an installed inventory.
Goal: flag each subject's baseline result (ABLFL) as the result
collected last on or before treatment start.
Input: laboratory results carrying subject, sequence number
(LBSEQ), collection date (ADT) and time (ATM), result (AVAL),
and the subject's treatment start date (TRTSDT).
Variables:
ADT,ATM,AVALandTRTSDTwould be carried through unchanged.ABLFLwould beYon the result with the latest date on or before treatment start, the latest collection time breaking a same-day tie, and blank on every other result.
Note: two results can share both the latest date and its collection time, and either one gives the subject a different baseline. The run fails and no dataset is accepted.
How to fix
Decide which of the two results is the baseline before choosing how to state it. Two results drawn at the same date and time are usually a sample and its repeat, or one result recorded twice; the source data system should carry the result the study reports, and correcting it there leaves the rule saying what it means.
When both results are reportable and the study names a further tie-break, add it after the collection time:
baseline_flag:
date: ADT
reference: TRTSDT
source: AVAL
window:
group_by: [USUBJID]
order_by: [ADT, ATM, LBSEQ]
Order by the term the study names; the sequence number above stands in for it and is not itself a clinical rule. Do not average the two results into one baseline value, which reports a measurement nobody took.
Expected failure
Editthe run is rejected; no artifact is acceptedexpected/error.yaml- phase
- derivation
- condition
- ambiguous_baseline
- rule
- WINDOW-9
expected/error.yaml
phase: derivation
condition: ambiguous_baseline
spec_paths:
- columns.ABLFL.derivation.baseline_flag
rule: WINDOW-9
context:
date: "2025-03-04"
match_count: 2
keys:
- USUBJID: "02"
Inputs
Under review1 source fileinput/lb.csv
Edit4 rows| USUBJID | LBSEQ | ADT | ATM | AVAL | TRTSDT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025-03-02 | 08:00 | 30 | 2025-03-03 | |
| 2 | 2025-03-02 | 14:30 | 34 | 2025-03-03 | |
| 1 | 2025-03-04 | 09:00 | 22 | 2025-03-05 | |
| 2 | 2025-03-04 | 09:00 | 25 | 2025-03-05 |
Unexpected Output
Under reviewNo artifact is producedNo fixture files in this directory.
Human review and assessment
| Dataset Name | Variable Name | Variable Label | Type | Codelist/Controlled Terms | Core | Computational Method | Origin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ADLB | USUBJID | Unique Subject Identifier | character | Copy value from LB.USUBJID. | Predecessor | ||
| ADLB | LBSEQ | Sequence Number | numeric | Copy value from LB.LBSEQ. | Predecessor | ||
| ADLB | ADT | Analysis Date | numeric | ISO 8601 | Copy value from LB.ADT. | Predecessor | |
| ADLB | ATM | Analysis Time | character | Copy value from LB.ATM. | Predecessor | ||
| ADLB | AVAL | Analysis Value | numeric | Copy value from LB.AVAL. | Predecessor | ||
| ADLB | TRTSDT | Date of First Exposure to Treatment | numeric | ISO 8601 | Copy value from LB.TRTSDT. | Predecessor | |
| ADLB | ABLFL | Baseline Record Flag | character | "Y" for the last record with ADT on or before TRTSDT and a non-missing AVAL within each group of USUBJID, ordered by ADT then ATM; blank otherwise. | Derived |
| Version | Date | Author | Description | Reviewer | Sign-off |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.7 | 2026-10-20 | yamaa docs build | Read a specification in the 1.0 surface as its 0.5 counterpart; state that missing values stay missing where a mapping declares no missing handler, and leave out a declared missing answer that restates a handler's default | ||
| 1.6 | 2026-10-17 | yamaa docs build | Describe collected date parts written as ISO 8601 date text and times of day counted in seconds since midnight | ||
| 1.5 | 2026-10-17 | yamaa docs build | Name collected precision in words instead of letter codes; state imputation fallbacks, minimum source precision, bounds ignored outside the collected period, and invalid text with no handler as an error; describe date and datetime shifts, imputation flag codes, and partial text giving no date part | ||
| 1.4 | 2026-10-15 | yamaa docs build | State datetime precision codes through the hour and minute, and complete only the time parts a collected datetime lacks | ||
| 1.3 | 2026-09-29 | yamaa docs build | Show study codelist names, external dictionaries, and ISO 8601 formats in variable rows; list the document's codelist values and metadata | ||
| 1.2 | 2026-09-29 | yamaa docs build | Classify ADaM copies from a declared input as Predecessor and recodes as Derived, and SDTM recodes of locally derived columns as Derived | ||
| 1.1 | 2026-09-29 | yamaa docs build | Resolve lookups into the donor record they select, and give every derivation shape a plain-language rule instead of its raw YAML | ||
| 1.0 | yamaa docs build | Initial generation from spec.yaml |
yamaa